毛东兴,高亚丽,俞悟周,王佐民

• 1:同济大学声学研究所,同济大学声学研究所,同济大学声学研究所,同济大学声学研究所 上海 200092 ,上海 200092 ,上海 200092 ,上海 200092

摘要：

声品质主观评价实验中,大样本量的成对比较法评价实验由于评价时间随样本量的平方增长而变得难以实现,为此提出了可有效减少评价工作量并使得实验易于实现的分组成对比较法。将总体评价样本分成具有相互联系的n个样本组分别进行主观评价,通过各组间的关联样本将各组的评价结果进行反演构建,得到总体样本的评价结果,进而分析其声品质特征。以车内噪声为例,介绍了分组成对比较法的实现方法,并与传统成对比较法以及语义细分法实验结果进行了对比分析,两者结果获得较好的一致性,证明了分组成对比较主观评价实验方法的有效性。

关键词：

Abstract: In subjective sound quality pair-wise comparison evaluation, time consumption grows with square of number of sound stimuli, which made the evaluation of large quantity of stimuli difficult to carry out. A grouped pair-wise comparison design (GPC) is proposed to greatly decrease time requirement and difficulties of subjective comparison test, where the whole evaluation stimuli are divided into n test groups, with reference link stimuli among each group. From subjective results of each group, final results of all stimuli are reconstructed, and their sound quality can be analyzed. With car interior sound stimuli as example, realization of the proposed GPC method is introduced. The results of GPC method are in good agreement with those obtained from pair-wise comparison and semantic differential method.

Keywords:

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(10374071)

通讯作者:

Email:

参考文献：

• 1 Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound-quality evaluation-A multilayered problem. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1997; 83(5):747-753
• 2 Otto N et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. Proceeding of the 1999 Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999. SAE Paper No.1999-01-1822
• 3 Guski R. Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information. Acta Acust-ica United With Acustica, 1997; 83(5): 765-774
• 4 Bodden M, Heinrichs R, Linow A. Evaluation of interior ve-hichle noise using an efficient psychoacoustic method. Proceeding of Euronoise 98, Munich, Germany, 1998
• 5 Chouard N. Perception of overall loudness and unpleasantness. Proceeding of Inter-noise 98, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998
• 6 Susini P, McAdams S, and Winsberg S. A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1999; 85(5): 650-656
• 7毛东兴,俞悟周,王佐民．声品质成对比较主观评价的数据检验 及判据．声学学报, 2005;30(5):468-472
• 8 Bradley R A, Terry M E. The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. 1. The method of paired comparisons. Biometnka, 1952; 39(4): 324-345
• 9 Otto N. A subjective evaluation and analysis of automotive starter sounds. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 1993; 41(3): 377-382
• 10周迅溢,王培,杨玉芳．关于汉语音节知觉空间的实验研究． 声学学报,2003;28(3):235-240